Should We Have Urine Testing For Welfare Applicants 27297

Uit interRAI-PEDIA, E-Learning voor RAIview
Ga naar: navigatie, zoeken

Like plenty of people in the Usa, I have work. I perform, they pay me. I pay my taxes and while they see fit the us government distributes my taxes. To be able to get that paycheck, I'm needed to move a urine test, which I've no problem with. I have nothing to hide and the key reason I've no issue with a drug test is. What I do have a problem with may be the distribution of my fees to people that are doing drugs and never have to move a urine test.

Should not one have to pass a urine test to acquire a welfare check, because I've to pass one to generate it for them?

Please comprehend, I've no issue with helping people get back on their feet. I do, on another hand, have trouble with helping someone sit on their bottom. Could you imagine if people had to pass a urine test to obtain a public assistance check how much money the state could save yourself?

A 1999 Michigan law called for a pilot program of random substance abuse testing in at the very least three counties. Drug assessment started at the beginning of October in Alpena, Presque Isle, and Berrien counties and a designated area of Western Wayne County, including some of Detroit's west side neighborhoods.

All the new applicants for that place needed to supply a urine test to officials or quit their to any government assistance. Socaldetoxcenter.Com/2018/10/31/All You Need To Know About Benzodiazepine Detox includes further concerning where to consider it. Furthermore, any applicants already within the program needed to submit to random screening.

A class-action suit was filed by the Michigan chapter of the ACLU two days ahead of routine testing. The suit charges the plan violates the constitutional rights of welfare recipients. Hit this website to research the purpose of it. A Detroit business and two Michigan parents (The Westside Mothers) were named in the match. The business centers around representing hundreds of welfare recipients and their loved ones. Kary Moss, executive director of the ACLU in Michigan claims, "The Fourth Amendment guarantees that no individual in this country could be put through a search by the us government unless there is reasonable suspicion that they have committed some crime, welfare recipients could be poor, but that's not a not yet, anyway."

I've talked to a number of people in person and on boards about their thoughts and the ones that oppose this have the same position, that it's unconstitutional. For me, it seems that I'm not moving random drug examination onto any random citizen. The welfare recipient decides to get support from the federal government. So much like submitting paperwork, you have to submit a urine test. Another stance people talk about is false positives. Then do a hair follicle test, well when they maintain fake positive.

Then discard the whole welfare program, if urine check are unconstitutional. Let your voice be heard on Political